Skip to content

Well before the nearly disastrous events in Butler, PA, the US presidential race had been heating up, with the (then) Democratic and Republican nominees Joe Biden and Donald Trump locked in a tight battle, according to the polls. While it's still too early to predict what will happen by November, what we do know is that Trump has been vocal about plans for aggressive trade measures if he wins in 2024. Therefore, it’s useful to consider ahead of time what impact such policies might have on asset prices, especially in emerging markets (EM).

The two candidates have significantly different trade policies, which could impact EM asset prices. Trump’s proposed 10% across-the-board tariffs and 60% China tariffs might be the starting point in negotiations, but we should expect more trade frictions under a Trump 2.0 scenario compared to a continuation of the Biden administration. In our view, tariffs would likely (1) weaken EM exchange rates (boosting the US dollar), (2) increase prices paid by consumers and (3) decrease margins/profits for exporters and producers.

As we discussed in a blog post earlier this year, Trump's trade views are well-known and lack the element of surprise that characterized his previous impromptu announcements on social media. Moreover, after experiencing a Trump presidency, governments and corporations worldwide have implemented contingency plans to manage global trade and supply-chain disruptions through nearshoring strategies. That said, Exhibit 1 shows the returns of EM and other asset classes following Trump’s victory in the November 2016 presidential election. Although medium-term factors may counterbalance some of these fluctuations, we suspect the initial market reaction to be similar in direction and scale as the 2016 move. With upcoming presidential debates, conventions and polling over the next three months, we expect some of the Trump premium to be reflected in asset prices.

Exhibit 1: Market Reaction to Trump’s Win in 2016

Source: Bloomberg. Changes shown represent October 31 to November 30, 2016. As of November 30, 2016. S&P 500 Index; DXY is represented by the US Dollar Index; US high yield (HY) is represented by the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index Value Unhedged USD; EM Rates are represented by the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets; US Trsy Index is represented by the Bloomberg US Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index; US investment grade (IG) is represented by the Bloomberg US Corporate Total Return Value Unhedged USD; EMBIG Div is represented by the J.P. Morgan Emerging Market Bond Index; EM foreign exchange (FX) is represented by the J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global Diversified FX Return. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

EM has been shaken by renewed American exceptionalism so far this year, which pushed US rates higher by about 50 basis points (bps), using the US Treasury (UST) 10-year yield as a proxy, and created a broader headwind for EM trades (rates, foreign exchange and spreads). As US growth and inflation data started to turn lower (which supports USTs and theoretically would boost risk assets across the board), EM carry trades were hit by idiosyncratic developments in select EM countries such as fiscal concerns in Brazil and the surprise Mexico election outcome. In effect, the broader local markets rebound was limited.

Exhibit 2: EM Performance Year to Date

Source: Bloomberg. As of July 9, 2024. EM Frontier is represented by the J.P. Morgan Next Generation Markets Index; CEMBI Brd (USD Corp) is represented by the J.P. Morgan Corporate EMBI Broad Diversified Composite Index; EMBI Global Div is represented by the J.P. Morgan Emerging Market Bond Global Diversified Index; EM GBI (Local Markets) are represented by the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

Looking to the third quarter, EM carry trades should be able to recover as US data aligns more closely with our base-case scenarios, creating a more favorable backdrop for carry trades. However, the upcoming US elections could disrupt EM asset price recoveries as protectionist policies from a potential Trump 2.0 presidency would negatively impact EM. Given these crosscurrents, we anticipate attractive total return opportunities across the EM landscape, where tactical trading strategies can be rewarded.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

Information on this website is intended to be of general information only and does not constitute investment or financial product advice. It expresses no views as to the suitability of the products or services described as to the individual circumstances, objectives, financial situation, or needs of any investor. You should conduct your own investigation or consult a financial adviser before making any decision to invest. Please read the relevant Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs), and any associated reference documents before making an investment decision.

Neither Franklin Templeton Australia, nor any other company within the Franklin Templeton group guarantees the performance of any Fund, nor do they provide any guarantee in respect of the repayment of your capital. In accordance with the Design and Distribution Obligations, we maintain Target Market Determinations (TMD) for each of our Funds. All documents can be found via the Literature Page or by calling 1800 673 776. 

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.