Skip to content

Key takeaways

  • Despite near-term macro, IT budget and contract renewal challenges faced by many software vendors, the secular outlook for the industry remains positive as companies continue to invest in digital transformation.
  • While the emergence of generative AI has sparked debate and uncertainty, we believe long-term investors should focus on the fundamental value proposition of software in driving business efficiency and innovation.
  • Recent insights from leading SaaS and cloud-based software companies underscore the resilience of the industry and the potential for ongoing growth and value creation.

Making sense of software industries

The software industry is currently experiencing a period of transition, with many vendors facing near-term challenges related to macroeconomic headwinds, evolving customer demands and the rapid emergence of new technologies like generative AI. While these factors have contributed to volatility in the market, we believe it is important for long-term investors to maintain perspective and focus on the fundamental value proposition of software in driving business transformation.

A weakening economy, whether it turns out to be a slow-growth soft landing or worsens into a recession, has led to cautious spending by enterprise customers (large companies) and even more so among small and medium-size businesses (SMB). This has weighed on software valuations compared to the S&P 500 Index (Exhibit 1). Software vendors serving the SMB market, who had seen relative weakness in 2023, continue to see a deceleration in net expansion rates of customer contracts. Visibility into the trough of business demand remains low and in many cases is being pushed out into the second half of this year and beyond.

Exhibit 1: Relative Software Valuations Near Recent Lows

Source: Bloomberg. As of August 5, 2024. *iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results. Standard deviation measures the degree to which the index return varies from the average of its previous returns. Enterprise value (EV) refers to the entire value of a company after taking into account both holders of debt and equity. EBITA = earnings before interest, taxes and amortization.  The EV/EBIT multiple is the ratio between enterprise value (EV) and earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT).

SMB is a more cyclical industry than enterprise, with software often more of a discretionary purchase. Tighter credit conditions due to higher for longer interest rates especially impact smaller businesses. Customers have also pulled back following overconsumption during the COVID-19 work-from-home period, while slower payroll growth broadly has hurt cloud software vendors. For this cohort, we expect challenging macro conditions will likely push a bounce back to the fourth quarter or into 2025. Moving up market to larger customers requires product focus, sales hiring and the right leadership. We view the SMB segment as very idiosyncratic and would focus on companies delivering the best execution.

Enterprise business models sending mixed signals

On the enterprise software level, AI has distracted key decision-makers and led to a diversion of attention and IT budget allocations. These trends have diverged based on the business model of each software provider, whether they be seat-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) or consumption-based cloud software vendors. SaaS contracts are based on individual users tied to a license with revenue recognized pro rata over the terms of the contract. Enterprise SaaS contracts often run for three years with vendors having experienced a stepdown in revenues upon contract renewal based on lower seat counts versus a few years ago. This is a bigger factor in stock price performance than we believe the market is currently appreciating. While SaaS vendors are cross-selling more services to their customers, those have not fully offset meaningful seat reductions.

A number of deals slipped at the end of this year’s first quarter, including several large deals for the larger SaaS vendors. This followed a stronger fourth quarter of 2023 that had caused some industry- watchers to extrapolate that trend into 2024. Enthusiasm over the benefits of generative AI and pressure to keep up with competitors has led enterprises to reprioritize IT budgets, leading to a pause in software spending that has shown up in performance dispersion within the IT sector (Exhibit 2).

Exhibit 2: Software Trailing Semiconductors in AI Spending Binge

Source: FactSet. As of June 30, 2024. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

Consumption-based businesses such as cloud vendors include a number of innovative database and data analytics software providers. Consumption models recognize revenue based on the amount of cloud resources consumed, typically in arrears. During the downdraft in demand after COVID, cloud vendors allowed customers to adjust contracts down accordingly and, therefore, have already endured much of the pain tied to slowing macro and optimization efforts.

We view cloud-based consumption as a better barometer of the health of the software industry as it provides real-time indicators of activity. Strong recent results from cloud vendors, then, lead us to believe that underlying fundamentals across the industry have been better than recent SaaS results suggest. AI offerings are just being rolled out for this cohort, which is leading to an acceleration in new bookings, a positive trend ultimately for forward consumption. At the same time, complicating matters, most cloud vendors have provided conservative forward guidance after being hurt over the prior 18 months by contract markdowns.

For both SaaS and cloud software vendors, the growing prominence of AI comes at a time when software contract expansions are slowing to reflect more gradual, normalizing usage growth following a COVID-induced spending binge. We believe these are transitory factors unlikely to disintermediate SaaS vendors. In fact, many recent earnings disappointments have been driven by timing or push outs of deals as opposed to lost business. That said, most SaaS vendors remain uncertain on the timing of a rebound and could see further guidance cuts before stabilizing.

For SaaS vendors, following the pandemic-era spending acceleration, we see seat reductions on three-year contract renewals as another headwind to enterprise vendors that has been underappreciated by investors. Customer headcounts have not grown at the anticipated low- to mid-teens rate modeled by software makers. The first big contracts of the digitization wave were signed following the onset of COVID and when financial conditions were significantly more accommodative than today.

For enterprise vendors, additional crowding out and pausing of spending has occurred due to the actions of two large software vendors in particular. A System Analysis Program (SAP) provider in Germany is gradually “end of lifing” prior versions of its software, leading to required upgrades to the latest versions of its software that shift from a perpetual license and maintenance model to a meaningfully higher recurring subscription fee (often 2x-3x the maintenance model). Another provider is doing something similar, and on fairly short notice, for the installed base of its recently acquired cloud and data center management software business, inducing a shift from perpetual to SaaS subscription contracts, which also entail a meaningful uplift. Both providers represent large ticket items and, we believe are likely having some interim “crowding out” effect in the marketplace.

Keeping the faith in long-term transformation

At its core, the software industry is built on the premise of using technology to solve complex business problems, automate processes and drive innovation. Despite the current challenges, this fundamental value proposition remains intact, and companies across industries continue to invest in digital transformation initiatives to remain competitive in an increasingly data-driven and automated world.

GenAI, while still in the early innings of use case testing and deployment, is at the forefront of business transformation. Software-based AI adoption itself is facing some interesting headwinds but is poised to see continued adoption, albeit at a slower initial pace than originally expected. With the first half of the year behind us, we expect typical seasonality in software results to ensue following the latest round of larger than expected estimate cuts, bringing software to a two decade low versus semiconductors. The current situation is highly reminiscent of the early 2016 software selloff, which was followed by strong gains thereafter. It may take some time, but history suggests that the greatest AI value will be created at the software layer.

While the current software transition may be painful for some vendors in the near term, it is important for long-term investors to keep the faith in the transformative power of software and the ongoing opportunities for growth and value creation in the industry. By focusing on companies with strong product offerings, differentiated market positions and a proven ability to execute on their growth strategies, investors can position themselves to benefit from the long-term trends driving the industry forward. Ultimately, the software industry remains a critical enabler of business transformation and innovation, and companies that can navigate the current challenges and emerge stronger on the other side will be well-positioned to create significant value for their shareholders in the years ahead.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

Information on this website is intended to be of general information only and does not constitute investment or financial product advice. It expresses no views as to the suitability of the products or services described as to the individual circumstances, objectives, financial situation, or needs of any investor. You should conduct your own investigation or consult a financial adviser before making any decision to invest. Please read the relevant Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs), and any associated reference documents before making an investment decision.

Neither Franklin Templeton Australia, nor any other company within the Franklin Templeton group guarantees the performance of any Fund, nor do they provide any guarantee in respect of the repayment of your capital. In accordance with the Design and Distribution Obligations, we maintain Target Market Determinations (TMD) for each of our Funds. All documents can be found via the Literature Page or by calling 1800 673 776. 

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.